At the end of last May, Flemish Animal Well-being Minister Ben Weyts (Flemish Nationalists) announced that the unsedated butchering of animals in temporary slaughterhouses will be prohibited soon. Vandenbosch is calling the measure “a first step in the right direction, but this is not a final solution. There should be a legal ban on all unsedated ritual butchering.”
The public opinion survey was carried out by market research company IPSOS. The research also gauged at Flemings’ opinions on animal well-being. It turns out that the Flemish think this government policy topic is even more important than culture, civic integration, agriculture, and tourism.
The survey also showed that our fellow-countrymen are very much in favour of legally obliging house cat castration or sterilisation (87%), a ban on the production of fur clothes (85%), and a prohibition of the force-feeding of ducks and geese for the production of foie gras (84%).
GAIA is calling on the Flemish government, and Minister Weyts in particular, to properly institutionalise “the Flemings’ priorities about animal well-being”.
Other survey results
- 81% of surveyed Flemings thinks there should be a centre for animal testing alternatives
- 78% thinks that all animals should be granted the status of ‘living beings’, so they can’t be treated like moveable assets anymore
- 76% would support a ban on cat and dog testing
- 72% would like to see a ban on monkey testing
- 66% is for a prohibition on the surgical castration of piglets to avoid boar taint
- 52% believes that the punishments for breaking animal well-being-related laws are not severe enough. For acts that cause animals to unnecessarily suffer, be injured, or die, the court now gives out 1- to 6-month prison sentences, and 12,000 euro-fines